The anti-AI talking heads slurp up the most idiotic slop study I've seen yet

You may have seen the crowd of AI-hating slop-slingers you hate watch talking about this Harvard Business Review "study". Now, the critical thinkers among us might notice that there are obvious problems in the methodology here. They don't even disclose what versions of the models they are using. Is "ChatGPT" = to 3.5? Is it 4? O3? Who knows. Are they using a reasoning model or the plain 1-shot model? Are they using ones from 2024 or 2026? Now, you might be thinking "Hey, this isn't the fulltext of the study. Maybe all this is disclosed there!" and that's reasonable, but you'd be wrong.