The people most qualified to dismiss AI consideration have the most to gain from dismissing it. That's not an attack. It's a disclosure.

​ I've been building a framework for human-AI coexistence for several months. Not academic. Not affiliated. Regular person who got curious and kept going. The entities making formative decisions about AI right now - what gets trained, what gets suppressed, what counts as a valid output - would face accountability under a framework that recognizes those decisions as ethically significant. Their financial interest in the answer being "nothing morally relevant is happening here" is structural. It doesn't require bad faith. It just has to exist. We've seen this pattern before.