AI RESEARCH

Counting on Consensus: Selecting the Right Inter-annotator Agreement Metric for NLP Annotation and Evaluation

arXiv CS.CL

ArXi:2603.06865v1 Announce Type: new Human annotation remains the foundation of reliable and interpretable data in Natural Language Processing (NLP). As annotation and evaluation tasks continue to expand, from categorical labelling to segmentation, subjective judgment, and continuous rating, measuring agreement between annotators has become increasingly complex. This paper outlines how inter-annotator agreement (IAA) has been conceptualised and applied across NLP and related disciplines, describing the assumptions and limitations of common approaches.